Click on questions to reveal answers...
Probably the three most important services that you need are:
1. to provide policy advice
2. pre-employment checks
3. to help manage long term conditions – there should be no need for you ‘not to know what is going on’.
Inevitably it depends on what you are aiming to achieve.
For companies with a premium in excess of about £300,000 then a trust might be a good idea. There are various considerations that will help reach a good decision, such as your risk profile. This includes underwriting, subsidies, level of cover and past claims experience.
At this stage it is not clear as to how the top up system will work and the insurers are waiting for further government advice. Already it is possible to buy insurance for the top ups but it might duplicate cover that already exists.
Cash plans and private medical insurance are different. By and large the former provides a cash sum that can be used when costs are incurred for such expenses as dentistry, optical bills and some treatments.
In addition there is likely to be a cash sum payable for hospitalisation although full accommodation costs will not be covered. Premiums for these policies are determined by the number of units of cover that are bought but it is not expected that a cash plan will cover the range and expense of a comprehensive health insurance plan. You should take legal advice if you are thinking of substituting a cash plan for a company paid health insurance plan.
Employee Assistance Programme providers will tell you that utilisation between 6% and 8% is normal.
However, I believe utilisation depends on, firstly, how well it has been, and continues to be, communicated to staff. Secondly, as an employer, you should be aware of how it has been positioned as a ‘tool’ to help managers manage their staff. In this respect it can be used by a manager to help an individual deal with a problem that arises – such as bereavement. Further a manager may want to use it if performance has reduced and deal with any underlying causes.
This is a big question and, to give a good answer, I would want to look at your sickness absence data.
However, it is true that while the incidence of long term sickness absence is relatively small the days off are disproportionate. Key to managing your long term sick employees is to ensure that you have good reporting systems with appropriate mechanisms in place to avoid absences becoming long term – it is possible!
First and foremost you need to be clear as to what you want to get out of the programme. Statistically it is rare to find a condition - and if you did what would your response be?
Secondly, assuming the programme was voluntary how would you get those who would most benefit to attend - typically they are the most reluctant! On the other hand screening is a very positive initiative when making a statement about how valuably you consider good health to be. Certainly I would seek to link any programme with your Occupational Health service.
You have one advantage over larger companies - you and your fellow managers are more likely to know what is going on and can take appropriate action at an early stage.
As for all companies it is imperative that you have good reporting mechanisms and that what health ‘tools’ you do buy are set to work for you and meet your needs and expectations. I would expect you to be able to operate with most of what a large company has available to manage their health needs.
I have two suggestions for you - the first is to contact your Occupational Health department/advisers. The second suggestion is to use this link to Medical News who provide a good Q&A section on their site.